🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," said the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content argues that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various individuals to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "might backfire". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this international conversation continues, the steps of this nation and its followers indicate that governments internationally are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.